News and headlines from Santafenewmexican.com


Movie Chile Review

Barrymore

By: Jonathan Richards
Published online: Friday, January 18, 2013
Appeared in: Pasateimpo

Share this review



More film reviews

Robot & Frank Two and a half chiles: This film wants very much to be one of those quirky enjoyable movies that tug at the brain and the heart- strings, but it comes up a few circuits short. It has some of the elements, and foremost among ...

Fun Size No Review: This Halloween, teenage Wren (Victoria Justice) faces an evening so chilling and horror-filled that it would make H.P. Lovecraft say, “OMG!” She’s invited to a party by the local hun ...

First Position Three chiles: Child performers can be frightening products of parents with their own thwarted ambitions, but First Position, a documentary about some of the talented young dancers in an international ballet competi ...

Hide Away No Review: The new feature from Santa Fe University of Art and Design film-school chair Chris Eyre is a haunting, meditative study of a businessman (Josh Lucas) who shuts himself away from the world to repair an ...

Oka! Two and a half chiles: Narrative is not director Lavinia Currier’s strong suit in this drama of local politics and tribal well-being set in a remote swath of jungle in the Central African Republic. The plot involves a ...

Capsule review

In 2011, Christopher Plummer went to Toronto to revive his 1997 Tony-winning performance as the great and wasted actor John Barrymore and make a movie record of it. The role is an actor’s dream, a smorgasbord of everything from dirty limericks to classical soliloquies, and Plummer plays it to the hilt. We find the 60-year-old Barrymore in 1942 in a vacant Broadway theater he has rented to rehearse for a comeback in one of his triumphs, Richard III. The great man enters drunk, and the rehearsal degenerates into wandering reminiscences. Occasionally, almost by accident, he slips into the business at hand, grasping for the words that will no longer stick in his boozy head. Barrymore is at its best when it accepts that it is a play, and only slips up when it tries to open up into a movie. 7 p.m. Friday, Jan. 18, only (screens with the short documentary Backstage With Barrymore). Not rated. 83 minutes.

Full Review

Barrymore, screen version of the play, not rated, Lensic Performing Arts Center, 3.5 chiles

Reviewers of Barrymore, Christopher Plummer’s new movie rendering of his 1997 Tony-winning stage performance, like to identify John Barrymore as Drew Barrymore’s grandfather. This is a sobering thought (and Barrymore was certainly a guy who could use a sobering thought). John Barrymore was a huge star, acclaimed as the leading Shakespearean actor of his time, cited by Orson Welles as the greatest Hamlet he ever saw. He was a major influence on the generation of Olivier and Gielgud, though nothing survives of his Shakespeare work but a few filmed snippets. He was one of the towering movie stars of the silent era. By the time talkies came along he was in alcohol-fueled decline, but he still made a string of classics in the early ’30s, including Dinner at Eight, Grand Hotel, and Twentieth Century.

Barrymore kept threatening to return to the stage, but by 50 his brain was too pickled to retain lines (in his later film roles his lines were written on black- boards just off camera). Toward the end, he made his living poking fun at the caricature of himself as a genial drunken has-been ham. In May of 1942, he collapsed while rehearsing Rudy Vallee’s radio show, and he died a few days later, at the age of 60.

The playwright William Luce imagines Barrymore just before his death, in a vacant Broadway theater, which he has rented to rehearse for a comeback in one of his triumphs, Richard III. Barrymore enters drunk, and keeps drinking, and the attempted rehearsal degenerates into a mishmash of wandering reminiscences, while his frustrated stage manager Frank (John Plumpis) stands offstage feeding him lines and pleading with him to get down to work.

The role is an actor’s dream, a smorgasbord of everything from songs and dirty limericks to classical soliloquies, and Plummer plays it to the hilt. When he first got hold of the play, which Luce wrote for him, Plummer was close in age to its subject. By the time of the recent revival in Toronto that serves as the basis for Érik Canuel’s film adaptation, the actor had tacked on about another decade and a half, although Plummer at 80 is in a lot better shape than Barrymore was at 60.

What is wonderful about the movie is the way it captures and preserves a great stage performance, something we can only wish had been done with Barrymore’s fabled Hamlet and Richard III (a few brief, tantalizing clips are available on YouTube). Plummer loves the character, and he plays him with enormous style and charm. He comes onstage pushing a rack of costumes and singing an old song about a gal in Kalamazoo. “Oops,” he says, “I forgot the baby!” He plunges into the wings and quickly returns with a black doctor’s bag stuffed with booze, and launches into an evening’s-length monologue, interrupted occasionally by the poor guy on book.

We hear about John Barrymore’s famous theatrical family, or families — the Barrymores on his father’s side, the Drews on his mother’s. Barrymore does wicked impressions of his famous siblings, Lionel and Ethel. He recalls his ambition to be an artist and his stint as an editorial cartoonist for the New York Sun, before he gave up and went into the family business. He reminisces about friendships, and a man who believed in his talent when the world thought him nothing more than a lightweight matinee idol.

And from time to time, almost by accident, he slips into the business at hand, grasping for the words from Richard III that will no longer stick in his boozy head. “Don’t give me a line unless I ask for it,” he snaps at his beleaguered prompter. “If I forget something, I shall simply say ‘line!’ ” (Short pause.) “Line!”

When Barrymore does stumble upon a passage from Richard III or a soliloquy from Hamlet, he delivers the words with a passion and a delicacy that evoke his heyday. The readings seem to come from somewhere deep within him, wisps of brilliance gathered from a distant star.

The conceit of the piece is that Barrymore is rehearsing in an empty house, or perhaps one filled with an audience of potential backers. The play can’t quite decide, and the movie has it both ways. Oddly enough, it more or less works. In real time, of course, the seats are full of theatergoers, and Barrymore plays off them. The movie sometimes shows the appreciative audience, sometimes a cavernous empty auditorium, a theater at its most hauntingly, vulnerably romantic.

Barrymore is at its best when it accepts that it is a play. Where it slips up is in Canuel’s attempts to “moviefy” it. The great man kicks a chair in frustration, and the camera self-consciously relocates to stage right to watch the chair come hurtling over. Barrymore reminisces about a trip to Italy with his friend playwright Ned Sheldon, and the movie opens up to a balcony in Florence. He leaves the stage for the play’s act break, but the movie follows him down to his dressing room. There are moments when a cinematic device works, but for the most part anything that distracts from the essential truth of Plummer’s live performance as that regal wreck John Barrymore is a bad idea. The play’s the thing.

DETAILS

Barrymore, film adaptation of the play, with Christopher Plummer

7 p.m. Friday, Jan. 18, only

Lensic Performing Ar t Center, 211 W. San Francisco St.

$22, discounts available; 988-1234, www.ticketssantafe.org

Advertisement

Home, the magazine

Monthy in
The Santa Fe New Mexican.

View past issues

Contact us

The Santa Fe New Mexican
202 E. Marcy Street
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
505-983-3303
Email your questions

Subscribe online

© Copyright The Santa Fe New Mexican